Vatel
Cast :Gérard Depardieu, Uma Thurman
Director :Roland Joffé
Studio :Miramax Home Entertainment
Format :Color, Closed-captioned
Released Date :January 01, 2000
DVD Released Date :May 06, 2003
Language :English (Dubbed)
Audience Rating :PG-13 (Parental Guidance Suggested)
 BUY THIS DVD FROM AMAZON

Customer Reviews
Rating
DateJuly 01, 2005
SummaryVisually Stunning
Content
Roland Joffe's directorial career has been a roller coaster from the powerful debut "The Killing Fields" in 1984 to the critically acclaimed "The Mission" in 1986 to the Demi Moore box-office bomb "The Scarlet Letter" in 1995. "Vatel" has apparently kept Joffe out of the director's chair for the last 5 years. Visually, it is stunning. If you love period pieces with spectacle, this is going to be great! The costumes are gorgeous and the sets exquisite. The banquet with fireworks and ice sculptures is visually stunning. Gerard Depardieu who is one of the most consistent working actors in the world and got his sole Oscar nomination in 1990 for Cyrano de Bergerac does a good job in his role. I found the picture was about courage. As Vatel, he stands up to the brother of Louis XIV who wants to use a kitchen boy for his sexual pleasure. Vatel seems to have a modern sense of outrage and protects the young lad, only to himself become the target of the brotherly affections. Vatel works for Prince De Conde played by Julian Glover from "Troy" while his lovely daughter Princesse De Conde played by Arielle Dombasle romps around lightheartedly. Julian Sands as Louis XIV who previously worked with Joffe in "The Killing Fields" plays the king with a balance of style and danger. Tim Roth plays the rather unsympathetic Marquis De Lauzun and hits on Uma Thurman. As the lady in waiting honored by the king's bed, Thurman is lovely and is one of the few along with Vatel to show a sense of ethics. Her role highlights the dependency of women of her day on pleasing men and her scene where she breaks down is heart-wrenching. "Vatel" certainly is not a flawless film, but it is delivered with style and panache. The themes of courage and personal ethics make it a film about something important. Enjoy!

Rating
DateJuly 19, 2004
SummaryNot such a swell party
Content
The biggest French box-office disaster in recent memory (it lost more money than Heaven's Gate, wiped out the massive profits of Asterix et Obelix Contre Cesar and nearly took Gaumont with it), this pretty much completes Roland Joffe's unbroken post-The Mission run of box-office and artistic failure. While not as bad as The Scarlet Letter, it's also not as much fun. Unfortunately, this is the kind of film Martha Stewart or Delia Smith might appreciate, but few others will.

It all starts off so well. So well that I was wondering why this has such a bad reputation, but it quickly becomes apparent that it really is just a film about a lavish three-day party seen from the point of view of the caterers. The fact that the party is thrown for the Sun King gives it plenty of visual opulence, but the lack of substance becomes more and more apparent as it drags on towards the third day - it's definitely one of those parties that goes on way too long and which you should have left much earlier while it was still in full swing. When one of the characters kills themselves because there aren't enough fish to go around and the script strains to turn it into an act of revolt against a world where nobility of the spirit counts less than accidents of birth, you know that someone's reading a little too much into it.

Gerard Depardieu looks alarmingly unhealthy throughout, Tim Roth gives a very bored reprise of his Rob Roy party piece and the wooden Uma Thurman is borderline disastrous/vaguely competent (the scene where she stops the wind by force of will is one of the most laughable pieces of face pulling in recent years). The supporting cast fare better - mostly Brits like Julian Glover, Timothy Spall, Richard Griffiths and Julian Sands. Shot in English, it is very odd to note that Depardieu is dubbed for the odd few words (but rarely full sentences) by another, very British sounding actor. Maybe he was too ill to make the ADR sessions.

It is lavish and you can see where the money was spent, you just can't see why.

(A version of this review appeared in Movie Collector magazine)


Rating
DateJune 21, 2004
SummaryA fine spectacle, but paper-thin story
Content
I have a soft spot for custom dramas. I enjoy all the lavish customs, the meticulously researched sets and the witty and elegant banter unachievable in non-celloid life.

With that said, I didn't like Vatel, which had all of the above qualities. This is due to a lack of remotely serviceable story.

Louis the 14th is visiting the estate of Prince de Conde, who hopes to wrangle an army commande from the king to pay off his heavy debts. His faithful steward, Vatel, is charged with ensuring that the King's visit will be memorable one. Vatel is a genius in all the arts of housekeeping and entertaining, a veritable 17th century Martha Stewart. Of course, when the House of Bourbon come a calling, the word "entertaining" acquire a whole new level of meaning. Throughout the movie we are treated to one dazzling set piece after another of Vatel's epic efforts.

Unfortunately, the highlights are overshadowed by very underwhelming story and characters. The central romance between Vatel and the lady-in-waiting generate less electricity than a AAA battery, and is implausible to boot. Bobbing along in the movie is a theme of a decent man standing up to a world of corruption. But with most of the filmmaker's effort focused on the lavish parties, it quickly gets lost amidst all the fireworks, ice-sculptures and food-preparation.

Of course, all that is pretty enjoyable to watch. Your eyes will have a feast, but it's mostly empty calories.


Rating
DateMay 16, 2004
SummaryThe dignity's triumph against the decay
Content
A brave and overwhelming movie. Ronald Joffe (a true master director)(The mission) describes carefully the efforts and creative virtues of Vatel, a true artist in the sense of that Jean Renoir statement: The art is not a job; it's the way you make that job".
All the corrupt and decadent atmosphere that surrounds the Kingdom and the Court of Louis XIV are shown through a powerful script and very brief but also bitter dialogues, and an amazing employment of the visual and corporal languages.

The direction is first rate , the astonishing visual angles are supported by a descriptive style, breathtaking "travellings" , monumental images and a superb cast. Depardieu show us once more why he's a living legend and one of the top twenty actors in the world; the exquisite and exceptionally gifted and beautiful Uma Thurman gives probably the most powerful performance in her career and obviously Tim Roth, amazing as always.
Watch this film. You'll be widely rewarded.
You'll feel and experience that special rapture , a trademark of the masterpieces


Rating
DateJanuary 19, 2004
SummaryVatel's "Choice"...
Content
Vatel is a very subtle story that is cleverly baked into a jumble of party decorations, conspiracies, and love as the main character François Vatel (Gérard Depardieu) is hurriedly preparing for the arrival of Louis XIV (Julian Sands) to the Chantilly chateau. Vatel is the man with the solutions to the problems, the artist behind the decor, and the organizer of all the creations. His job as the steward requires the outmost concentration and eye for detail, and he loves his job. It is also Vatel's belief that he is in control of his fate, but as the party commences he is soon to find a different conviction. Vatel is a film of realism and class struggle as it reveals the different worlds of aristocracy and the plebeians, which together will bring the audience a genuine cinematic experience.
SuperiorPics.com © 2009